Ad

Prosthetic heart valves ( a consise overview)

Prosthetic heart valves


There are two main types of prosthetic heart valves, mechanical valves which are durable but require chronic anticoagulation
because of thrombogenicity and biological valves which are less durable, but also less thrombogenic. Biological valves do not require anticoagulation (unless there are other reasons for anticoagulation, such as atrial fibrillation).

The hemodynamic characteristics of a prosthetic heart valve (flow velocity, peak pressure gradient, mean pressure gradient) are influenced by the type of the valve and the diameter of the valve ring (smaller diameter entails a higher peak flow velocity and pressure gradient). An echocardiogram should be performed after the implantation of a prosthetic valve so that the findings can be used for future comparison.

Mechanical heart valves


Mechanical heart valves consist of a sewing ring and the occluder (the moving part of the valve which moves from the opening to the closing position at the appropriate phases of the cardiac cycle). Bileaflet mechanical valves, the type of mechanical valves currently used, have two occluders (leaflets), while single tilting disk and cage-ball valves have one occluder ( a disk, or a ball) respectively.
Tilting disk valves: They are classified in single and double tilting disk (bileaflet) valves. Nowadays mainly double disk (bileaflet) valves are used.

Single tilting disk valves (Medtronic-Hall, Omniscience, Bjork-Shiley, 
Lillehei-Kaster) consist of a ring and a disk, that shifts between the opening position and the closing position, supported by metal struts. In the opening position the disc forms with the plane of the ring an angle of 60-80 degrees.

For a single tilting disk mechanical valve at the aortic position, the peak blood velocity is usually in the range of 1.6-3.3 m /sec. At the mitral position, the peak velocity is usually 1.4-1.7 m /sec.

The bileaflet (double disk) valves (e.g. St Jude Medical, Carbomedics, Sorin Bicarbon, Medtronic Open Pivot, ATS valve, On-X) consist of two semi-circular pyrolytic carbon disks attached to the ring of the valve with special hinges. At the opening position, each disc forms an angle of 75-90 degrees. (This is a general description, but there are some differences in certain technical details between valve types).

The bileaflet valves are the mechanical valves currently used because they have better hemodynamic characteristics ( lower transvalvular gradients) and low thrombogenicity in comparison to other types of mechanical cardiac valves, such as cage ball or tilting single disk valves

 For a double disk mechanical valve in the aortic position the peak blood velocity is usually 2-3 m /sec (up to 3.3 m /sec for valves with a smaller diameter) and the peak pressure gradient 16-45 mm Hg.(Higher values apply to a small diameter valve ring: 19 or 21 mm). Of course, these limits are approximate and not absolute.

For a double-disk mechanical valve at the mitral position, the mean pressure gradient is usually 2.5-7 mm Hg and the peak velocity is 1.1-2 m /sec.

Small deviations may be observed from the above flow velocity measurements and pressure gradients. An echocardiogram should be performed after the implantation of a prosthetic valve so that the measurements can be used for future comparison

The Cage-Ball Valve (Starr-Edwards) is an old valve type, which has been in use for twenty-five years, but nowadays it is not selected for implantation. It consists of a ball of silicone, swinging in a cage of metal alloy (cobalt-chromium). On the valve base, there is a sewing ring that serves to secure the valve to its position. When the valve opens, the ball moves away from the ring and blood flows around it, while on closing the ball fits onto the ring, preventing blood regurgitation. This valve is bulky (unsuitable for patients with a small aortic annulus or small left ventricle). Turbulent flow also occurs around the sphere. Due to the above, a higher pressure gradient is generated compared to other valves. In addition, turbulent flow causes endothelial injury, so this valve is more thrombogenic.  On auscultation of the patient, multiple opening sounds are heard due to the impact of the ball on the cage supports. There is also a metallic closing sound.


Bioprosthetic heart valves (Biological tissue valves or bioprostheses) 

Bioprosthetic valves (bioprostheses) can be heterografts or xenografts (valves made of animal tissue), which are composed of
porcine, bovine, or equine tissue (valvular or pericardial), or homografts, which are preserved human aortic valves. In cardiac auscultation, normally functioning bioprosthetic (biological) valves do not differ from normal native valves. There are several types of bioprosthetic valves: .
Heterografts or XenograftsHeterografts include stented and stentless biological valves. In stented valves, the biological valve tissue is mounted on a rigid stent (plastic or metallic), also called sewing ring, covered with fabric. Conversely, stentless bioprostheses do not include a stent, thus they use the patient’s native aortic root as the valve stent. 
 Heterografts are: 1) Porcine valves properly suited to a suture ring made of synthetic material. Such valves are: Carpentier-Edwards, Hancock II and Mosaic (Medtronic). With echocardiography, for the Carpentier-Edwards valve at the mitral position, the expected peak velocity is about 1.5-2 m /sec and the expected mean pressure gradient of 5-9 mmHg. In the aortic position, the expected peak velocity is 2-3 m /sec and the expected mean pressure gradient  8-20 mmHg.

A more recent development is the introduction of stentless porcine valves. The absence of a stent enables implantation of a larger valve for a given native annulus size, resulting in a larger effective orifice area (EOA) and a lower transvalvular pressure gradient, which is an advantage of these valves. Such are: Edwards Prima Plus, Medtronic Freestyle, and Toronto SPV (St. Jude Medical.)


 2) Valves made of bovine pericardium. These include the following: Perimount series valves (Edwards LifeSciences). and Ionescu-Shiley, which is no longer produced.
Pericardial valves are also two valve types used in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): SAPIEN XT (Edwards LifeSciences) made of bovine pericardium and CoreValve (Medtronic) made of porcine pericardium. The valves used for TAVI are trileaflet bioprosthetic valves mounted in a wire mesh stent. Delivery of the valve is performed over a catheter and the stent is expanded in the position of the aortic valve. TAVI can be performed with a catheter advanced from the femoral artery in retrograde fashion across the aortic valve, or from a small thoracotomy with the catheter passed through the apex of the left ventricle and advanced across the aortic valve. This procedure is used for calcific aortic stenosis with the native valve being compressed but remaining in place. TAVI is indicated in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who have a high risk of adverse surgical outcomes due to comorbidities. Possible complications include stroke, vascular complications (at the entrance site at the femoral artery), and paravalvular regurgitation

Homografts or allografts
Preserved aortic valves from human cadavers.
Usually taken 24 hours after the donor's death, they are sterilized by antibiotics and maintained at a temperature of -196 ° C. The recorded Doppler velocities are approximately the same as those of native aortic valves.
Autograft  (Ross operation)
Pulmonary autograft is the patient's own pulmonary valve implanted to replace a pathologic aortic valve, during a Ross operation. The pulmonary autograft consists of the pulmonary valve with its ring and a small part of the main pulmonary artery. The aortic valve and the aortic root are replaced with the autograft, to which the coronary arteries are then implanted. Subsequently, a pulmonary allograft (cadaveric graft) is implanted in place of the pulmonary valve. Advantages of this operation are that the autograft placed in the aortic position has a very good hemodynamic behavior and better durability than other biological valves. The disadvantage is that it is a technically difficult procedure that requires a long duration of extracorporeal circulation and is only performed in a few cardio-surgical centers with experience.


Selection of the type of prosthetic heart valve

The patient should be informed about the advantages and disadvantages of each option. Mechanical valves have greater durability, but need lifelong anticoagulation, whereas bioprostheses are less durable, but have the advantage of a lower thrombogenic potential and do not need lifelong anticoagulation.
In favor of a mechanical prosthetic valve are the following:
Age< 65 with a long life expectancy, no contraindications for anticoagulation, or a patient already receiving anticoagulation treatment.
In favor of a biological prosthetic valve are the following:
Age  65, or a limited life expectancy,  a contraindication for anticoagulation, or a woman of child bearing age who desires pregnancy.


Antithrombotic treatment in patients with prosthetic heart valves


Bioprosthetic valves:

Bioprosthetic (biological) valves are clearly less thrombogenic than mechanical ones, so they do not necessarily need anticoagulation. However, there is a risk of embolism during the initial postoperative period (mechanism: thrombus production on the prosthetic valve support ring). According to the guidelines in patients with a bioprosthetic valve in the mitral or tricuspid position, it is a good practice (with a category IIa-not absolute- indication) to administer anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist (acenocoumarol or warfarin) for the first 3 months after valve implantation. Postoperatively heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight) is initially administered and treatment with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is also initiated. When the INR reaches therapeutic levels (2-3) heparin is discontinued and oral anticoagulant treatment is continued (with INR 2-3) for 3 months After 3 months, the risk of thromboembolism is much lower. (INR = international normalized ratio). Therefore, anticoagulation with VKA is discontinued, and permanent antithrombotic treatment with aspirin 80-100 mg (or clopidogrel 75 mg) per day is initiated.
Oral anticoagulation using a VKA should also be considered for the first 3 months after surgical mitral or tricuspid valve repair (a class IIa indication)
 After surgical implantation of a bioprosthetic valve at the aortic position, because at this position there are higher blood flow velocities resulting in less risk of thrombosis, guidelines recommend administering only low dose aspirin  (eg 80-100 mg daily) for the first 3 months after surgery. This has a Class IIa indication.
However, guidelines allow the option to give these patients (with an aortic bioprosthesis) in the first 3 months a VKA instead of aspirin but with a  class IIb indication ( a "weak" indication).
Exception: In patients with a bioprosthetic valve that also have other risk factors for thromboembolism (such as: a previous embolic episode, atrial fibrillation, or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction with an ejection fraction  35% or a hypercoagulable state), anticoagulation with  INR 2-3 is administered lifelong (and not just for the first 3 months). This is an absolute (class I) indication for permanent anticoagulation.
After transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), dual antiplatelet therapy is administered for the first 3-6 months. This is followed by lifelong single antiplatelet therapy in patients who do not need oral anticoagulation for other reasons. In case of TAVI, where an additional thromboembolic risk factor (atrial fibrillation, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, hypercoagulability) is also present, a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is permanently administered with target INR 2-3, while aspirin 80-100 mg, or clopidogrel 75 mg daily is given during the first year and then it is discontinued


Mechanical prosthetic heart valves



Lifelong oral anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is recommended for all patients with mechanical prosthetic valves (this is an absolute-class I-recommendation). Note that the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are not used in patients with mechanical cardiac valves. The target INR depends on the thrombogenicity of the type of the mechanical valve prosthesis and patient risk factors (such as mitral or tricuspid valve replacement, previous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, mitral stenosis of any degree, severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction with EF <35%).
Thrombosis and thromboembolism risks are greater with a mechanical valve in the mitral than in the aortic position.

If the patient has a mechanical valve prosthesis of low thrombogenicity and no other risk factors for thromboembolism the target INR is around 2.5, but if 1 or more of the other risk factors are present, then the target INR is around 3.

Mechanical heart valves with a low thrombogenicity are most bileaflet valves: St Jude Medical, Carbomedics, Sorin Bicarbon, Medtronic Open-Pivot, ATS, On-X (all these are mechanical bileaflet valves), and also Medtronic Hall (a single disk valve).

If the patient has a mechanical valve prosthesis of medium thrombogenicity and no other risk factors for thromboembolism the target INR is around 3, but in the presence of 1 or more of the other risk factors the target INR is around 3.5
Mechanical valves of medium thrombogenicity are some other bileaflet valves with insufficient data.

If the patient has a mechanical valve prosthesis of high thrombogenicity and no other risk factors for thromboembolism the target INR is around 3.5, but in the presence of 1 or more of the other risk factors, the target INR is around 4.
Mechanical valves of high thrombogenicity are: the ball-cage valve (Starr-Edwards) and most single disk valves (with the exception of Medtronic Hall) such as Lillehei-Kaster, Omniscience, Bjork-Shiley and other single tilting-disc valves.
Good management of anticoagulation is important since a high variability of the INR is a strong independent predictor of
reduced survival after heart valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis.

The addition of low-dose aspirin (75-100mg/day) to VKA should be considered if thromboembolism occurs, despite an adequate INR (IIa C)

 In cases when VKA treatment should be interrupted, bridging with therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended.

Patients with mechanical heart valves undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 


In patients with mechanical heart valves undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting, there is a need for a temporary combination of anticoagulant (VKA) and antiplatelet drugs( aspirin, clopidogrel), a situation that increases the risk of bleeding. Guideline recommendations for these patients can be summarized as follows:
Initially triple antithrombotic treatment (VKA+aspirin+clopidogrel) is administered for 1 month (it may be given for up to a maximum duration of  6 months if the patient is considered to have a high thrombotic risk and a low bleeding risk). After the period of triple antithrombotic treatment, dual therapy (VKA+clopidogrel, or VKA+aspirin) follows until up to 12 months after coronary stent implantation. Then antiplatelet treatment is discontinued and the patient continues only VKA (anticoagulation). 
In patients with a high bleeding risk (when bleeding risk is considered as more important than ischemic risk), triple antithrombotic treatment is not given. Then treatment after PCI includes only a period of dual antithrombotic therapy (VKA+ clopidogrel) which can last up to 12 months. After that antithrombotic therapy continues only with the VKA. A high ischemic risk ( a high risk for a subsequent myocardial infarction) is considered to be present in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome or having certain characteristics of the coronary lesion (e.g. presence of thrombus, a complex lesion), whereas the bleeding risk is estimated by using the HAS-BLED score.
HAS-BLED stands for:
Hypertension (systolic >160 mmHg) or
Abnormal renal function (creatinine >2.2 or dialysis or renal transplant)

Abnormal liver function (Cirrhosis or Bilirubin >2x Normal or AST/ALT/ALP >3x Normal)
Stroke (history of previous stroke)
Bleeding (
Prior major bleeding or predisposition to bleeding
Labile INR (unstable or high, remains in the therapeutic range for < 60% of the time)
Elderly (> 65 years)
Drugs (medication usage that predisposes to bleeding, such as NSAIDs or antiplatelet drugs)  or

 alcohol(≥ 8 drinks/week)
The presence of each of the above adds 1 point to the score.
A HAS-BLED score of ≥3 indicates high risk for major bleeding ( defined as intracranial hemorrhage, or bleeding requiring hospitalization, or hemoglobin decrease > 2 g/dL, and/or transfusion) 


Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of a patient with a prosthetic heart valve

In general, emphasis should be placed on informing the patient about proper adherence to anticoagulation and endocarditis prophylaxis.
According to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) a patient who undergoes a valve replacement requires after 6-12 weeks a complete follow-up examination, including clinical examination (history of possible symptoms, cardiac auscultation to check for the expected auscultatory findings for the type of prosthetic valve and also to check for a possible new cardiac murmur), ECG, chest X-ray, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and blood tests. 

Physical examination and cardiac auscultation of a patient with a prosthetic heart valve

Significant abnormal  findings from the physical examination of a patient with a prosthetic heart valve may include a new or changed murmur, muffled valve sounds, or signs indicative of an embolic event (e.g. a neurological deficit in a case of an embolic stroke).
The expected auscultatory findings in patients with a prosthetic valve depend on the type of the valve prosthesis. Normally functioning biological prosthetic valves have the same auscultatory findings as normal native valves. Among the mechanical valves, the bileaflet mechanical valves, which are the type of mechanical valves currently implanted, do not produce an opening sound but only a metallic closing sound. Single-tilting disc mechanical valves produce an opening sound and a closing sound, while the cage-ball valves produce multiple opening sounds, due to the impact of the ball on the cage. On auscultation of the heart, the absence of the expected sounds produced by the prosthetic valves is a pathological finding indicative of limited valve mobility due to thrombosis or tissue hyperplasia.
All mechanical valves in the aortic position additionally produce a characteristic mild systolic ejection murmur. In contrast, the small normal regurgitation of blood (small physiological insufficiency) present in the mechanical valves does not produce a murmur. Therefore, in a patient with a mechanical aortic valve, the finding of a diastolic murmur is a pathological finding, indicating a paravalvular leak (paravalvular regurgitation).

Echocardiography of prosthetic heart valves

The echocardiogram should include measurement of the transvalvular pressure gradient, color Doppler examination to search for a paravalvular regurgitation and assessment of ventricular function.
Echocardiographic findings and measurements within the first few weeks after surgery will serve as a reference for comparison with future findings. A basic parameter is the pressure gradient (pressure difference) across the valve when it is open. The measurement of the peak velocity and the calculation of the peak and mean transvalvular pressure gradient is performed with the continuous wave Doppler. All prosthetic valves have a peak transvalvular velocity which is higher than that of a normal, native valve. They also create a greater pressure gradient than a normal natural valve, given that the latter creates a negligible pressure gradient. As mentioned, depending on the type of prosthetic valve, there are some expected limits for the pressure gradient (some approximate limits have been given above).
Elevated transvalvular velocity and pressure gradient in a prosthetic valve, as compared to the expected values, is observed in cases of: 1) Valve malfunction causing stenosis (thrombus or pannus development, mechanical degeneration and stenosis due to degeneration and calcification of a bioprosthetic valve), 
2) In cases of increased flow through of the valve with no narrowing of the valve (conditions with an increased cardiac output such as hyperthyroidism, anemia or a significant valvular or paravalvular regurgitation). In the case of significant regurgitation at the valve, there is a volume overload of the ventricular cavity located proximally to the valve, resulting in a larger volume of blood passing through the valve when it opens and thus in a higher velocity and pressure gradient.
3) In prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), where there is no valve dysfunction, but the valve is small for the patient's body size and circulatory needs. 

Echocardiographic indications of prosthetic valve stenosis

In a prosthetic aortic valve (bioprosthetic or mechanical), indications of a significant stenosis are a peak flow velocity> 4 m / sec, a mean pressure gradient> 35 mmHg, an effective valve orifice <0.8 cm2, and an acceleration time > 100 msec. An indication for a possible stenosis or a moderate stenosis is a peak velocity between 3 and 4, a mean pressure gradient between 20 and 35, an effective orifice between 0.8 and 1.2 and an acceleration time between 80 and 100.  The acceleration time is the time interval between the onset of blood flow through the valve and the peak flow velocity. Apart from the adequacy of valve opening, it is also affected by the heart rate and contractility of the left ventricle. When the shape of the flow signal obtained with the continuous Doppler is triangular with the peak velocity occurring early, this is a sign of normal flow, whereas when it is symmetrical and rounded, this is indicative of stenosis.
In a prosthetic mitral valve (biological or mechanical), a sign of significant stenosis is a peak flow velocity> 2.5 m / sec, a mean pressure gradient ≥ 10 mmHg, 
an effective valve orifice<1 cm2  and a pressure half time (PHT) > 200 msec.
 An indication of a possible stenosis, or moderate stenosis of a prosthetic mitral valve is a peak velocity is between 1.9 and 2.5 / a mean pressure gradient between 6 and 10 / an effective orifice area between 1 and 2 and a PHT between 130 and 200. Apart from valvular function, the PHT is also influenced by left ventricular diastolic function (compliance).

Calculation of the functional orifice area or effective orifice area (EOA) of prosthetic valves 

The functional orifice area or effective orifice area (EOA) of prosthetic valves is calculated with the continuity equation, which is based on the principle that flow in a heartbeat is the same through all areas of the circulation. 
The EOA of a prosthetic aortic valve is calculated with the continuity equation as
 EOA= (CSA LVOT x VTI LVOT )/VTI PrAV . 
CSA LVOT is the cross-sectional area of the LVOT, VTI LVOT the velocity-time integral measured by using pulse wave Doppler in the LVOT, VTI PrAV the velocity-time integral obtained by continuous wave (CW) Doppler through the prosthetic aortic valve. The cross-sectional area of the LVOT is obtained from diameter measurement just proximally to the prosthesis from the parasternal long-axis view.  CSA LVOT = πr= 3.14 x (d/2)2= 0.785 d2,where r is the radius and d is the diameter of the LVOT measured in the parasternal long axis echocardiographic view. Instead of measuring d, the diameter of the sewing ring of the prosthetic aortic valve can be used in this equation as the diameter of the LVOT.
The EOA of a prosthetic valve in the mitral position is calculated as EOA = (CSA LVOT xVTI LVOT )/VTI PrMV,
where VTIPrMV is the velocity-time integral obtained by CW Doppler through the prosthetic mitral valve. 
CSA LVOT = 0.785 d2, where d is the diameter of the LVOT measured in the parasternal long axis echocardiographic view, just proximal to the aortic valve.

Useful videos !! (LINKS)
Assessment of Prostheses in Echocardiography 123sonography (Prof Thomas Binder)

Prosthetic Valve Assessment (William A. Zoghbi, MD) DeBakey Institute For Cardiovascular Education & Training
LINK https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0ERw33Irdg

Prosthetic valve echocardiography 
(Dr. John Chambers, Youtube channel MEDICAL IMAGING)
LINK https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZwE_KBxCeo

Ad/ment


Prosthetic valve complications

Prosthetic valve thrombosis

There is an increased risk in case of inadequate anticoagulation in a patient with a mechanical prosthetic valve (INR significantly lower than target value) and mechanical prosthetic valves in the mitral position, or the older types of mechanical prosthetic valves (cage-ball, single leaflet). Clinical presentation can be with embolization, e.g. an embolic stroke, or acute limb ischemia, or acute valvular dysfunction causing acute pulmonary edema, or sudden death.
On physical examination diminished intensity of valve sounds may be present. On echocardiography or fluoroscopy, there is a reduced movement of the valve leaflets. There is also an increased transvalvular gradient on echocardiography.
Treatment: Anticoagulation with heparin. If the thrombus is <5 mm on echocardiography, then anticoagulation may suffice. If the thrombus is > 5 mm then apart from heparin, thrombolysis, thrombectomy or valve replacement will be required. Generally for thrombosis of left-sided prosthetic heart valves surgical treatment with valve replacement is indicated, unless there is a prohibitive surgical risk or a small thrombus. For thrombosis of a right-sided prosthetic valve, the treatment of choice is thrombolysis (fibrinolysis). Surgery is indicated if thrombolysis is unsuccessful 24 hours after discontinuation of the infusion.

Embolization

An embolization in a patient with a prosthetic heart valve more commonly manifests as an ischemic stroke (cerebral infarction).
In patients with prosthetic valves presenting with peripheral embolization, endocarditis should also be considered.
Risk factors include: atrial fibrillation, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, age > 70 years, mitral prostheses, cage-ball valves, the presence of more than 1 prosthetic heart valve. If there are clinical findings suggesting a stroke, a brain computed tomography (CT) should be performed immediately to exclude an intracranial hemorrhage ( in case of an intracranial hemorrhage anticoagulation is withheld and specialist help from a neurologist or neurosurgeon is also needed).

Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM)

PPM is a situation where the problem is not prosthetic valve dysfunction, but a small prosthetic valve for patient needs. The effective orifice area (EOA) of the valve is indexed to body surface area (BSA), i.e. it is divided by the BSA. In a prosthetic valve in the aortic position when EOA / BSA0.85 cm2/m2, then there is only mild or no PPM. On the contrary, when EOA / BSA ≤ 0.65 cm2/mthen there is considerable PPM and significant stenotic phenomena. Intermediate values below 0.85 but over 0.65 cm2/m2  suggest a moderate degree of patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM).
In a case of a prosthetic valve at the mitral position, when 
EOA / BSA >1.2 cm2/m2, there is only mild or no mismatch between prosthetic valve and patient. Conversely, when EOA / BSA ≤ 0.9 cm2/m2, then there is considerable PPM and significant stenosis. Intermediate values, below 1.2 but over 0.9 cm2/m2  indicate a moderate degree of PPM.
Several studies link PPM with a decreased postoperative cardiac index, a worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, a higher likelihood of late adverse events and shorter mean patient survival.

Haemolysis in patients with prosthetic heart valves

A mild haemolysis is common in patients with mechanical prostheses (even with normal prosthetic valve function). Severe haemolysis is not common and is usually a result of prosthetic valve dysfunction (regurgitation, dehiscence, infection).
Blood tests in case of haemolysis show anemia (decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit), increased levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and reticulocytosis.
Treatment: Administration of folic acid and ferrous sulphate may be needed to increase production of erythrocytes. In severe cases, blood transfusions will be required and identification and treatment of the underlying problem (including valve replacement for cases requiring frequent blood transfusions).

Prosthetic valve endocarditis

Early prosthetic heart valve endocarditis (≤ 2 months after implantation) is usually caused by staphylococcus epidermidis and often presents as acute endocarditis with a fulminant clinical course and high mortality rates (>20%). Late prosthetic valve endocarditis is usually caused by microorganisms that are the usual pathogens in native valve endocarditis, such as streptococci which are the most common causative agents, followed by gram negative bacteria and enterococci.
The imaging modality of choice is transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) which can detect vegetations, or complications of prosthetic valve endocarditis, such as valve dehiscence or an abscess.


Paravalvular leak

It is the regurgitation of blood in an area just next to the sewing ring of the valve, due to a poor contact of the valve with adjacent tissues to which it has been sutured. Possible causes include an infection (endocarditis), calcification or fibrosis of the native valve annulus, resulting in poor contact with the suture ring, or suture detachment. In patients with a mild (small) paravalvular leak, the prognosis is good and only periodic follow up is required. In a severe paravalvular leak that causes symptoms, significant hemolysis, or left ventricular dilation due to volume overload, surgical or transcatheter management is required. A paravalvular leak is more common with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) than with surgical implantation of a prosthetic valve.


Prosthetic valve dehiscence

Dehiscence (detachment) of the prosthetic valve suture ring from the valve annulus may occur in the early postoperative period due to surgical errors, the presence of extensive calcification of the valve annulus, infection (endocarditis), fragile valve annular tissue due to previous surgery, or chronic corticosteroid use. Late dehiscence of a prosthetic valve is due to infectious endocarditis. An indication of valve dehiscence is an abnormal rocking motion of the prosthetic valve in echocardiography or fluoroscopic examination. Dehiscence is an indication for emergency surgery.


Prosthetic heart valve structural degeneration

Bioprosthetic valves, as opposed to mechanical valves, have the advantage of being less thrombogenic, but they also have the disadvantage that they develop degenerative lesions over the years (thickening and/or calcification with progressive stenosis or regurgitation). Factors associated with increased risk for a patient to develop degenerative lesions in a bioprosthetic valve are young, age, a bioprosthetic valve in the mitral position, renal failure, and hyperparathyroidism. The most common cause of malfunction of a bioprosthetic valve is the structural degeneration of the valve.

BIBLIOGRAPHY AND LINKS

Zoghbi, WA, et al. Recommendations for Evaluation of Prosthetic Valves With Echocardiography and Doppler Ultrasound. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2009;22: 075-1014.
LINK http://www.onlinejase.com/article/S0894-7317(09)00676-2/pdf

Baumgartner H, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), European Heart Journal, ehx391, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391




Chambers JB. Prosthetic heart valves. The International Journal of Clinical Practice 2014; 68:1227-1230 LINK http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcp.12309/pdf

Bajaj RKarthikeyan G, et al.CSI consensus statement on prosthetic valve follow up. Indian Heart Journal 2012; 64: S3 -S11 LINK https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244813/pdf/main.pdf




Habets, J. et al. Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction Nat. Rev. Cardiol 2011;8: 466-478.

Huang G1, Schaff HV, et al. Treatment of obstructive thrombosed prosthetic heart valve.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 ;62:1731-1736.